Featured

  • 0
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
prev
next
News image

The RoboCup Robot Challenges

Created in 1997, RoboCup is an annual tournament composed of several robotic competitions including soccer, rescue, and tasks around the home. The competitions allow teams to not only have fun, but assist in the development of the fields of robotics ... Read more

News image

Distributed AI Coming to a Computer Near You

Canadian high-tech startup Intelligence Realm is constructing a distributed virtual brain, one computer at a time. Utilizing a computational model we’ve seen in such projects as SETI@Home, the system will harness the computing power of thousands of machines throughout ... Read more

News image

Bioloid: Highly Configurable Robot

Since being released a couple years ago, the Bioloid hobbyist robot has quickly grown in popularity due to its incredible versatility. Available in several kits of varying complexity, the robot is capable of being programmed and physically configured to ... Read more

News image

AI Yet to Master Boardgame 'Go'

The Chinese game of Go has proven to be a tough challenge to those in the artificial intelligence field.  Advanced AI has been developed for many other games, with perhaps the most famous being chess. However, Go is in ... Read more

News image

Evolving Artwork Generated by Distributed System

The Electric sheep open-source screensaver utilizes a network of 60,000 computers to render frames of an ever changing collection of fractal-based animations. A genetic algorithm is employed to ensure that no two animations are the same and that desirable visuals ... Read more


The Remote Control Animals
(1 vote, average 5.00 out of 5)
Cyborgs and Medical Implants - Academia
Monday, 01 June 2009 19:16
bull-smallSeveral universities are experimenting with technologies that allow researchers to control animals through electrical stimulation of the brain and muscles. Additionally, DARPA is interested in animal cyborgs that would be critical components of future surveillance programs. Note that these projects are the inverse of what we've seen with the Frankenbot, the robot controlled by a rat brain, a project covered late last year by Synthetic Thought.

The first experiments involving electrical control of an animal took place in the '50s and '60s at Yale University. A Bull was implanted with an electrode which, when charged, would stop the animal in its tracks.

José Delgado at Yale University created the first cyborg animal in the 1950s. Delgado discovered where to insert electrodes in the brains of several species, including bulls, to acquire crude control of their movement. In one dramatic demonstration in 1963, he stood in a bullring in Córdoba, Spain, as one of his cyborg bulls charged at him. With just seconds between him and a good goring, Delgado flicked a switch and the bull skidded to a halt.
The following video shows Dr. Delgado’s bull as well as a cat whose emotional state is controllable through electrical stimulation of the hypothalamus:


In 2002 a team at the State University of New York Health Science center tapped into a rat’s brain, allowing the researchers to trick the rat into thinking that its whiskers were being touched. They then trained the rat to move in the direction of the sensation, which allowed them to control the rat in mock search and rescue missions.

Again, from New Scientist:
Linda Hermer-Vasquez at the University of Florida in Gainesville later joined the project to train the cyborg rat to identify specific scents, such as humans or explosives, to demonstrate that it could be used in search-and-rescue missions to find people trapped under rubble, for example, or to sniff out bombs.

To give the animal's operator a rat's-eye view, the most advanced generation of cyborg rats were kitted out with video-camera backpacks. These souped-up rats were trained to board a rolling carrier so that they could be easily transported to the site of their mission.

To test the system, the team allowed a rat to descend from the carrier and remotely steered it to the area they wanted searched for traces of an explosive. Once in the correct area, they switched off their remote control. "When the rat realised that it was no longer being controlled, it went into odour-sniffing mode," says Hermer-Vasquez. Within a few minutes, the rat had successfully identified the source of the scent. They repeated the test several times, with the same result.
Birds have also been the subjects of these types of animal control experiments. Researchers at the Shadong University of Science and Technology in Qingdao, China tapped into the brains of pigeons to control their flight wirelessly using a laptop.

One of the poor birds:
pigeon-brain

DARPA’s Hybrid Insect Micro-Electro-Mechanical Systems project (HI-MEMS) is interested in the control of much smaller animals – flying insects. They want to have the ability to attach or implant tiny microphones and transmitters into the creatures so that the insects may assist in surveillance activities.

The New Scientist article explains how tiny devices are implanted in such delicate creatures:
During their development from larvae to adults, most winged insects, including moths and beetles, undergo metamorphosis in a pupa stage, during which enzymes dissolve much of the larval tissue and the insect is rebuilt. The HI-MEMS project aims to merge artificial control systems with those of the insect by inserting the devices during the pupa stage. The idea is that as new organs and tissue develop, they will create strong, stable connections between the devices and the insects' neural or muscular tissues. The control devices become part of the adult insect's body.

This is no mean feat. The implants must be small and light enough not to interfere with the adult insect, and must reliably contact the neurons that control flight. HI-MEMS researchers have fabricated ultra-thin neural probes - a few hundred of micrometres across - out of flexible plastic, with traces of metal completing the electrical connections.

… implanted the flexible plastic probes into tobacco hawkmoth pupae seven days before the moths emerged. They found that inserting them any earlier meant the tissue was too fluid to seal around the probe, but any later and development was too advanced and the probes damaged the moths' muscles. A probe is embedded in each set of flight muscles on either side of the moth and a connection protrudes from the moth's back. This can be hooked up to the tether wires which also deliver control signals and power. According to their paper, the team has also designed and built a battery-powered onboard control system, though there was no mention of whether they had made moths fly using this untethered arrangement.
After implantation these insects are controllable through different means. Cornell University researchers have developed a system where electrical impulses are directly applied to a moth’s wing muscles, allowing them to control the direction of the moth’s flight.

Researchers at the University of Michigan have been taking a slightly different tact with June Beetles. They have inserted electrodes into the brains of the insects and control the flapping of the insects’ wings via stimulation of neurons, rather than direct muscular simulation as is the case in the Cornell experiments. The researchers have connected a computer to the system which is used to force the insect into flight from a stationary position.

The following video shows these insects in action:


AddThis Social Bookmark Button
Comments
Search
Bob Riley  - Discomfort   |71.33.43.xxx |2009-06-02 10:58:08
I am frankly concerned at the lack of reverence for all life that this kind of experimentation represents. Whether it be done for commercial gain or for use in war, I think it is wrong to manipulate these creatures for our ends in these fashions.
PW  - when does an empathetic ethical zeitgeist begin   |71.209.185.xxx |2009-06-29 19:27:18
i am wondering what it means for the future if we implement these radically advancing technologies into our civilization and advances when our ethical concerns for life and the state of the planet remain stagnant and disgustingly indifferent, science sometimes seems just a little too sangfroid about manipulating living systems like so much insentient hardware. bunch of Dr. Mengeles.. it is disturbing as well how much and to what extent nazi science was implemented at the end of WWII for many military and scientfic ends...if this experimentation is to better life on this planet long term, to what extent does this kind of disregard set a precedent, and what a harbinger of whether ours is a utopian or dystopian future...
Daviticus  - Pardon?   |142.227.53.xxx |2009-06-03 00:32:49
Who said it was for either?
PW  - I used to torture small animals for FUN   |71.209.185.xxx |2009-06-29 19:29:33
Only registered users can write comments!

3.26 Copyright (C) 2008 Compojoom.com / Copyright (C) 2007 Alain Georgette / Copyright (C) 2006 Frantisek Hliva. All rights reserved."

 

bottom